Is there a Python policy?

2003-10-15 Thread Oliver Elphick
I remember seeing a draft Python policy some time ago but it is not linked from http://www.debian.org/devel/ The reason I am looking for it is that I need to decide what to do with the postgresql package. The current package (7.3.4-8) contains the binary packages python-pygresql and python{x.x}-p

Re: Is there a Python policy?

2003-10-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Oliver Elphick writes: > I remember seeing a draft Python policy some time ago but it is not > linked from http://www.debian.org/devel/ see /usr/share/doc/python. It currently in a "proposed" state, I think we won't submit it as formal policy for sarge. > The reason I am looking for it is that I

Python 2.3 transition completed in testing

2003-10-15 Thread Colin Watson
python2.3 |2.3.2-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc python2.3 |2.3.2-2 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc A version of python2.3 that sets the default python ve

Re: Python 2.3 transition completed in testing

2003-10-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-15 02:26]: > A version of python2.3 that sets the default python version to 2.3 has > been accepted into testing. It should now be safe to upload python > packages that were previously in a mini-freeze. Good work. Congratulations to all the people invo

Re: Python 2.3 transition completed in testing

2003-10-15 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:42:18AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-15 02:26]: > > > A version of python2.3 that sets the default python version to 2.3 has > > been accepted into testing. It should now be safe to upload python > > packages that were pr