Re: Summary of python transition problems

2003-10-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Colin Watson wrote: > Incidentally, I think that python2.3 should definitely depend on python, > even if unversioned. This is what python2.2 in testing does, and it > would avoid the "I installed python2.3 but my programs that use > /usr/bin/python still don't work!" FAQ. So include a "Recomm

Re: Summary of python transition problems

2003-10-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Colin Watson writes: > > Buggy packages > > == > > gnue-* is missing here. No; gnue-common in testing depended on python2.1, not python. The version in unstable should certainly be fixed, but it's not holding up testing

Re: Summary of python transition problems

2003-10-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:25:29PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:50, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Colin Watson writes: > > > While this would probably help users, it won't make the transition > > > easier as far as testing is concerned, because python comes from the > > > pyt

Re: Summary of python transition problems

2003-10-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:02:50PM +1000, Peter HAWKINS wrote: > I'm the maintainer (just returning from an extended unexpected > vacation). > The problem is this (from the buildd log): > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), debconf, python2.2-dev (>= 2.2.3), > python2.3-dev, apache2, apache2-d

Re: Summary of python transition problems

2003-10-01 Thread Peter HAWKINS
Hi... On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:53:13PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Missing builds > > > == > > > > * libapache2-mod-python: powerpc > > > already asked for rebuild ... no reaction. > > I could take a look a