Python Software Foundation License?

2003-08-14 Thread Ganesan R
Hi, Many Python packages seem to be licensed under the "Python Software Foundation License" (see http://www.opensource.org/licenses/PythonSoftFoundation.php). This license appears to apply to a specific release of Python, so I am not clear how to apply this license for a package. Is it okay to i

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

2003-08-14 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:42:56PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: | On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:33, John Goerzen wrote: | > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:14:55PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: | > > > Actually, all that have that are now uninstallable. Some important ones | > > > have that, such as libwxgtk

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

2003-08-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Derrick 'dman' Hudson writes: > So what's the problem? The problem is > > $ apt-cache show python2.3 | grep Depends | head -1 > Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libdb4.1, > libncurses5 (>= 5.3.20030510-1), libreadline4 (>= 4.3-1), > libssl0.9.7, zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

2003-08-14 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 07:11, Matthias Klose wrote: > Derrick 'dman' Hudson writes: > > So what's the problem? The problem is > > > > $ apt-cache show python2.3 | grep Depends | head -1 > > Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libdb4.1, > > libncurses5 (>= 5.3.20030510-1), libreadl

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

2003-08-14 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:33, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:14:55PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > Actually, all that have that are now uninstallable. Some important ones > > > have that, such as libwxgtk2.4-python. > > > > > > Shouldn't they depend on python2.2 instead >