> Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2
> as well is not a good solution in my opinion.
Modem users must spend an extra hour downloading just to get a tiny
package too.
Quoting John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
> themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems,
> these are the same.
>
> The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 i
Quoting Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
> > themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian
> systems,
> > these are the same.
> >
> >
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 12:54, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > Using this the python package can "notify" all packages that depend on
> > it by calling dpkg-reconfigure on them;
>
> That would work for me too, of course.
>
> >> egrep "^install ok installed:[^:]*:.*$PYT
Hi,
Donovan Baarda wrote:
> Note that there is currently a bug in dpkg-query where ${Depends} output
> is prefixed with some binary garbage... this means your modification
> will not match where $PYTHONXY is the first dependency.
>
Ouch.
> I don't believe you could use python in this case... thi
I've put a summary of packages needing a rebuild in a world-writable
file at http://people.debian.org/~joss/python-list.txt
Please mark your uploads (maintainer or non-maintainer) in this file
(gluck:~joss/public_html/python-list.txt). This is probably the time to
start NMU's for library packages.
Here's my perspective on this :
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:10:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
| > #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 helps programs running everywhere, i.e. they
| > will work with people that installed python in /usr/local/bin for
| > instance.
Use this if you are distributing your scrip
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
| On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 22:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
| > > Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
| > > changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
| > > (not the pythonX.Y
Hi,
python-tal is maintained by the QA team so I thought I'd help and NMU
it.
I added a python2.3-tal package and it built correctly but the
no-version package (python-tal) still depends upon python2.2-tal (I
changed Build-depends-indep to python (>= 2.3), python (<< 2.4) ).
Where did I miss the
Le mar 12/08/2003 à 16:45, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> python-tal is maintained by the QA team so I thought I'd help and NMU
> it.
>
> I added a python2.3-tal package and it built correctly but the
> no-version package (python-tal) still depends upon python2.2-tal (I
> changed Build-depen
Josselin Mouette wrote :
> What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
> fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
> expected.
Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as default python
version (waiting for python-bsddb3). I don't have ac
Josselin Mouette writes:
> I've put a summary of packages needing a rebuild in a world-writable
> file at http://people.debian.org/~joss/python-list.txt
> python-numarray-ext => updated but the new package misses python (>= 2.3),
> python (<< 2.4)
unneeded, as it depends on python-numarray.
any
Le mar 12/08/2003 à 18:52, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote :
>
> > What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
> > fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
> > expected.
>
> Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as d
Hi,
This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the
python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer
who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my
reply, however, so I assume he has other things to do at the moment.
Meanwhile, I'm continuin
Joey Hess wrote:
>Josip Rodin wrote:
>
>
>>Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
>>every time python* is mentioned? :P
>>
>>
>
>Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
>that followed. And I keep expecting to see the same se
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:32:33PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Well, I haven't had any python-related collisions from the pythonX.Y
> scheme... python (>= 2.2), python (< 2.3) I've seen, of course... it
> would be so much nicer if someone added debian support to distutils,
> though ;-) (*hint*)
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 09:39, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:32:33PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> > Well, I haven't had any python-related collisions from the pythonX.Y
> > scheme... python (>= 2.2), python (< 2.3) I've seen, of course... it
> > would be so much nicer if someone
17 matches
Mail list logo
