On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I need the python-xml package to rebuild some of my packages
> (python-gtk, python-gtk2, python-gnome2, python-pyorbit, rubrica), but
> python-xml is away from unstable because of transition.
>
> Several packages us
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 01:04, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> you end up with multiple packages where the only difference is the
> versioned depends on python not very efficient.
I'm not saying it is efficient, but it is simple and it works.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 01:08, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> The recently suggested alternative of putting modules in
> /usr/lib/site-python (or wherever) with only one set of *.pyc's for
> the default python is much simpler. It does rely on "root" only using
> the default python to avoid re-compiling pyc
> Yesterday was saturday, and I don't read my mail on week ends. The
> updated package is in progress (i.e. pbuilder is running right now),
> and I have contacted Jerome Marant who's my usual sponstor (I'm not a
> DD). I was planning to ask someone on the list to sponsor the upload if
> I don't
Quoting Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Yesterday was saturday, and I don't read my mail on week ends. The
> > updated package is in progress (i.e. pbuilder is running right now),
> > and I have contacted Jerome Marant who's my usual sponstor (I'm not a
> > DD). I was planning to
Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
> changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
> (not the pythonX.Y package) to rebuild all .pyc's and .pyo's in this
> directory upon upgrade.
>
> Matthias, do you think
Hello,
Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems,
these are the same.
The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 is wrong
because he has his own python2.3 on the path prio
John Goerzen writes:
> Hello,
>
> Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
> themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems,
> these are the same.
>
> The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 is wrong
> because he h
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 06:50, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
> themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems,
> these are the same.
>
> The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env pytho
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 22:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
> > changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
> > (not the pythonX.Y package) to rebuild all .pyc's and .pyo'
Hi,
Donovan Baarda wrote:
> Using this the python package can "notify" all packages that depend on
> it by calling dpkg-reconfigure on them;
That would work for me too, of course.
>> egrep "^install ok installed:[^:]*:.*$PYTHONXY([ ,]|$)" | \
That regexp looks like it should look like this ins
11 matches
Mail list logo
