Help needed with #159208

2002-09-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Wajig, once upon a time, compiled its .py files. That wasn't really useful as the performance bottlenecks come from the externally called programs, not wajig itself. So I removed that a while ago. However, the versioned Depends and Build-Depends persisted ... and so I just got a bug report, #1592

Re: Help needed with #159208

2002-09-05 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:48:40AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > In response, I am about to suggest the following: > > wajig (0.3.13-2) unstable; urgency=low > > * debian/control: Depends changed to python -- we do not need versioned > Depends as .py[co] file are not (anymore) shippe

python-unit package

2002-09-05 Thread Alexandre
Hello, I'm the current maintainer for python-unit, and I'm wondering on the need to have this package as a separate one. The main reason for the existence of this package is for python1.5 users, since pyunit is part of the main python distribution since 2.0. The problem I have is that upstream h

Re: python-unit package

2002-09-05 Thread Alexandre
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:45:39PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: > * if so, do we drop support for pyunit in python1.5, or add pyunit as a > patch? Forget this line: the pyunit package is not built for python1.5. Alexandre Fayolle -- LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logi

Re: Help needed with #159208

2002-09-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
> You should depend on exactly the Python versions you support, not on > "python". For example > Depends: python1.5 | python2.1 | python2.2 I see. But why not simply "Depends: python (>= 1.5)" > And if you dont compile any Python packages, why do you still have to > build-depend on python-de

Re: Help needed with #159208

2002-09-05 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:48:38AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > > You should depend on exactly the Python versions you support, not on > > "python". For example > > Depends: python1.5 | python2.1 | python2.2 > > I see. But why not simply "Depends: python (>= 1.5)" I think this is wro

Re: Help needed with #159208

2002-09-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:48:38AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > > > > > You should depend on exactly the Python versions you support, not on > > > "python". For example > > > Depends: python1.5 | python2.1 | python2.2 > > > > I see. But why not simply "Depends: python (>= 1.5)" >

Re: Help needed with #159208

2002-09-05 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:48:38AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I see. But why not simply "Depends: python (>= 1.5)" I made the experience[*] that I cannot guarantee support for future Python versions (in this case Python >> 2.2). There is always some little detail that breaks. So I give in

python_2.2.1-10 contains a file in common with idle-python2.1

2002-09-05 Thread Robert Murray
Hi when upgrading python in unstable I get the following. Preparing to replace python 2.1.3-6a (using .../python_2.2.1-10_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement python ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python_2.2.1-10_all.deb (--unpack ): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/pyd