On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
| It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
| packages remaining:
Also gadfly depends on 1.5. Unfortunately it appears stagnant
upstream (last release in '98). The testsuite passes for 2.1 but not
2.2. Both v
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> | It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
> | packages remaining:
>
> Also gadfly depends on 1.5. Unfortunately it appears stagnant
> upstream (last release in '98). The
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
> bug report for ftp.debian.org to remove the python1.5 package.
Eh?
python1.5's still useful to users, isn't it, especially ones with
important python programs t
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 10:22:12PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
| dman writes:
| > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
| > | It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
| > | packages remaining:
| >
| > Also gadfly depends on 1.5. Unfortunately it
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
| > If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
| > bug report for ftp.debian.org to remove the python1.5 package.
|
| Eh?
|
| python1.5's stil
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > If I don't hear a serious reason to keep python1.5, I plan to file a
> > bug report for ftp.debian.org to remove the python1.5 package.
>
> Eh?
>
> python1.5's stil
It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
packages remaining:
- pydb: http://bugs.debian.org/119203
Not yet ported to 2.1, but we do have an alterbate debugger
available (idle).
- python-pam: http://bugs.debian.org/119213
See http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/py
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
> packages remaining:
...
> These packages are:
>
> - pychecker
> - python-pqueue
> - python-egenix-mxbase
> - python1.5-imaging
> - python1.5-psycopg
I've also seen python1.5-orbit in
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:26:49PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
> > packages remaining:
> ...
> > These packages are:
> >
> > - pychecker
> > - python-pqueue
> > - python-egenix-mxba
Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is also xtalk that fails to work with newer python,
> but so far I have not gotten around to uploading new version
> with correct dependencies (it time permits, I'd rather
> try to fix the program itself)
I've had a look at the package. It
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - python-pam: http://bugs.debian.org/119213
>See http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python for a try.
>However I couldn't get it reliably working ...
Could you please give more details on this? I do use this package and wo
dman writes:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> | It looks like the move to python (v2.1) is done. There are three
> | packages remaining:
>
> Also gadfly depends on 1.5. Unfortunately it appears stagnant
> upstream (last release in '98). The testsuite passes for
Mikhail Sobolev writes:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > - python-pam: http://bugs.debian.org/119213
> >See http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/python for a try.
> >However I couldn't get it reliably working ...
>
> Could you please give more details on
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was
submitted by ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on
Sunday, December 9, 2001 at 21:09 GMT
---
Information given by user:
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Hey, what's up,
14 matches
Mail list logo
