Re: Problems with new policy

2001-11-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 08:38:19PM +0100, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > going slightly off-topic, this problem is a good example of i dubt i > always had with debian sonames. shouldn't a package name libfoo4 provide > a library named libfoo.so.4.x.x? That depends on whether the library is actually

Re: Problems with new policy

2001-11-27 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:18:08AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > or > > > > libsip.so.2.python2.1.x.y... ugly! it is even possible? > > That sounds best to me in the absence of any better coordination from > upstream, or being able to use a single libsip. I agree that it's ugly, > though. >

Re: Packages that still need to be updated to new python policy

2001-11-27 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "AT" == Anthony Towns writes: AT> Bug#119218: gnats2w 0.15.2 gnats2w 0.15.2 all This one is orphaned upstream and is going to be removed from the distribution. I'm waiting a bit if anyone wants it and if not then I'll ask for its removal. I assume it has already been removed from woo