I updated python-happydoc to the proposed policy and uploaded it to
ftp-master.debian.org:/home/doko/www/python-uploads/ . Lintian marked
'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
--
Harry Henry Gebel
West Dover
Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
At the moment, lines like
Depends: python1.5
cause an error, E: python-script-but-no-python-dep
Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
Depends: python (>= 2
Hi.
Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
No, this is not equivalent! The Conflict means that I cannot install
happydoc and python2.2 simultaneously, and this is not desired.
I know t
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:40:33PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
> packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
Lintian is advisory only.
> Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> Depends: python
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
> > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used
> > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)'
> No, this is not equivalent!
Uh, yes, they are equivalent.
> The
Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only suggestion is, if you are at all in doubt about supporting
> multiple versions of python, don't use the 2.1.1 "support only the
> default" packaging option, instead use the 2.1.3-1. "multiple
> versioned packages" option.
>
> Note that even if
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Federico Di Gregorio writes:
> > On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> > > 3. As the policy mandates, I have made the packages depend on
> > >
> > >python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
> > >
> > >Lintian doesn't really like that.
Anthony Towns wrote:
Uh, yes, they are equivalent.
Ah, yes, given that the Python-Policy only allows one default
Python interpreter, not more than one.
Greetings, Bastian
> > Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> > Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
>
> This is a lintian bug. It's not bothering to notice that one's a less-than
> and the other's a greater-than.
Btw, isn't this Depends line problematic anyway? I could have python 1.5
a
* Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 15:46]:
>
> > > Also, someone else reported that lintian complains against
> > > Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)
> >
> > This is a lintian bug. It's not bothering to notice that one's a less-than
> > and the other's a greater-than.
>
> Btw, isn't
> "python" is a real package, no virtual one. I.e. at any given time,
> there is only one package "python" on a system (neither python1.5 nor
> python2.1 will provide "python").
Duh, okay. :)
Thanks - Ben.
On 29-Oct-2001 Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Has anyone started modifying lintian? If I remember correctly,
> packages that generate lintian errors will be rejected...
>
anyone is me, the maint. (-: Although any pythoners among you willing to get
dirty with perl are welcome to send patches.
> At
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Uh, yes, they are equivalent.
> Ah, yes, given that the Python-Policy only allows one default
> Python interpreter, not more than one.
Given that dpkg allows only one package called "foo" to be installed
Hi,
I've prepared some fixes for all bugs in Iceme (I ITAed some
time ago). I did not upload a new version since I was waiting
for the Python transition.
I'll upload a new version soon.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marant.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
