* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-15, 23:16:
I'm not sure what to do with libapache2-mod-python, though.
Fix it? :)
the problem is: it looks like I introduced it¹ in the first place :-)
(it was hardcoded to 2.4 before)
Why is that a problem? :)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-py
[Jakub Wilk, 2012-05-15]
> * Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-15, 22:54:
> >I'm not sure what to do with libapache2-mod-python, though.
>
> Fix it? :)
the problem is: it looks like I introduced it¹ in the first place :-)
(it was hardcoded to 2.4 before)
[¹] in revision 2063
--
Piotr Ożarowski
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-15, 22:54:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-python@lists.debian.org;tag=python:Versions
Thanks!
I'm not sure what to do with libapache2-mod-python, though.
Fix it? :)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@list
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2012-05-14]
> [Julien Cristau, 2012-05-14]
> > > is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
> > > should?)
> >
> > Some grepping in the lintian lab should be able to answer that.
>
> it's not that bad actually, I will report bugs/patches later this
[Julien Cristau, 2012-05-14]
> > is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
> > should?)
>
> Some grepping in the lintian lab should be able to answer that.
it's not that bad actually, I will report bugs/patches later this week
apparmor_2.7.103-2_source/debfiles/con
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-05-14, 12:57:
I do wonder however if there is a good reason for dh_python{2,3} to
still generate *:Version substitution variables.
is it safe to drop it?
I wouldn't do that at this point of the release cycle. But after the
wheezy release, it should be harmless.
(i.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:57:17 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Jakub Wilk, 2012-05-14]
> > I do wonder however if there is a good reason for dh_python{2,3} to
> > still generate *:Version substitution variables.
>
> is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
> sho
[Jakub Wilk, 2012-05-14]
> I do wonder however if there is a good reason for dh_python{2,3} to
> still generate *:Version substitution variables.
is it safe to drop it? (i.e. is it used only in XB-Python-Version, as it
should?)
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
* Mathieu Malaterre , 2012-05-14, 12:22:
Hi there,
I am starring at the following warning:
warning: package python-gdcm: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions}
Ignore the warning.
In the old days you would add "XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}" to
binary package
[CC me pls]
Hi there,
I am starring at the following warning:
warning: package python-gdcm: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions}
My package reads as:
$ cat d/control
Source: gdcm
...
X-Python-Version: 2.7
...
Package: python-gdcm
Section: python
Architecture: any
Depends
10 matches
Mail list logo