[drebs, 2017-09-23]
> Hi, I am interested in updating the subliminal[2] package[1]. Is there
> someone else already working on that? If not, what would be the process
> for having it uploaded? (i am not a dm or dd) Should i send the source
> package to this list? Would someon
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 18:35 -0300, drebs wrote:
> Hi, I am interested in updating the subliminal[2] package[1]. Is
> there
> someone else already working on that? If not, what would be the
> process
> for having it uploaded? (i am not a dm or dd) Should i send the
> source
>
Hi, I am interested in updating the subliminal[2] package[1]. Is there
someone else already working on that? If not, what would be the process
for having it uploaded? (i am not a dm or dd) Should i send the source
package to this list? Would someone sponsor it? :)
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
I don't work on any of those packages, but I think your logic makes sense.
.hc
Carl Suster:
> I see that subliminal is currently using the tarballs from PyPI and then
> patching in the source for the nautilus extension which is of course
> absent from there. Also the Github-h
I see that subliminal is currently using the tarballs from PyPI and then
patching in the source for the nautilus extension which is of course absent
from there. Also the Github-hosted tarballs include a test suite which is not
in the PyPI tarballs.
It seems that the upstream nautilus
5 matches
Mail list logo
