Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:26:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > While preparing some example packages to experiment with > python-central and python-support, I did see some issues with both > proposals, in that the dependencies are not fulfilled for every python > version that both packaging syst

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-02 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 21:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > that is, packages with private modules but without extension modules > > and no modules in /usr/lib/python2.x. how many packages are this? 2006/2/3, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Off the top of my head and in no particular order:

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-02 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 23:02 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 02 février 2006 à 21:09 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > Josselin Mouette writes: > > > There is still a situation we can improve easily, though: private > > > modules. Currently, they have to migrate with python transitions,

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 février 2006 à 21:09 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > Josselin Mouette writes: > > There is still a situation we can improve easily, though: private > > modules. Currently, they have to migrate with python transitions, and > > this is only because of byte-compilation. The python-suppor

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-02 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 21:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Josselin Mouette writes: > > There is still a situation we can improve easily, though: private > > modules. Currently, they have to migrate with python transitions, and > > this is only because of byte-compilation. The python-support way of

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Josselin Mouette writes: > There is still a situation we can improve easily, though: private > modules. Currently, they have to migrate with python transitions, and > this is only because of byte-compilation. The python-support way of > doing things should still be fine for them, and it can reduce

Re: some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-02-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 26 janvier 2006 à 15:26 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > While preparing some example packages to experiment with > python-central and python-support, I did see some issues with both > proposals, in that the dependencies are not fulfilled for every python > version that both packaging sys

some issues with the proposals for the python packaging infrastructure

2006-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
While preparing some example packages to experiment with python-central and python-support, I did see some issues with both proposals, in that the dependencies are not fulfilled for every python version that both packaging systems claim to support. Feedback is welcome. For an example see python-pm