Re: removing python3-trollius

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
s tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about >>> why, I think it makes more sense to stop building trollius for Python 3. >>> >> >> Sounds reasonable to me! >> > > So a wrinkle here is that trollius-redis was packaged as it is a > dependency of pagure.

Re: removing python3-trollius

2017-07-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
nse to stop building trollius for Python 3. >> > > Sounds reasonable to me! > So a wrinkle here is that trollius-redis was packaged as it is a dependency of pagure. Pagure is currently Python 2 only so removing python3-trollius and python3-trollius-redis will not impede that effort in the

Re: removing python3-trollius

2017-07-10 Thread Tristan Seligmann
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 11:45 Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > python3-trollius fails tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about > why, I think it makes more sense to stop building trollius for Python 3. > Sounds reasonable to me!

removing python3-trollius

2017-07-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, python3-trollius fails tests with Python 3.6 and rather than think about why, I think it makes more sense to stop building trollius for Python 3. It's reason for existence is to backport asyncio to older Python 3 versions (and Python 2, but I'm not talking about the python 2 package here). As