* Maykel Moya , 2013-01-03, 22:08:
md5sum of .tar.gz from github differs from that of the .tar.gz
generated by gbp.
It's something odd. The tar themselves have the same sums, it's the
gzipping what introduces the difference.
The first byte differing between both .tar.gz is at offset 0x08[1],
El 08/11/12 23:08, Jakub Wilk escribió:
Hello
New package available at https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyxs
> There are two technical problems with your repacked .orig.tar: - You
> should not include the .git directory. - There should be a single
> top-level directory, so that the tarball can
El 10/12/12 16:57, Jakub Wilk escribió:
> * Maykel Moya , 2012-11-09, 13:44:
>> I'll take care of the issues noted here, including contacting upstream
>> regarding the blob and the inclusion of GPL-3 text. Thanks for the
>> review.
>
> It's been over a month. Any news?
Hello
I contacted upstrea
* Maykel Moya , 2012-11-09, 13:44:
I'll take care of the issues noted here, including contacting upstream
regarding the blob and the inclusion of GPL-3 text. Thanks for the
review.
It's been over a month. Any news?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian
On Friday, November 09, 2012 01:32:53 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 12:44, Maykel Moya wrote:
> > Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to
> > debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of
> > this (link to fine documentation is we
* Maykel Moya , 2012-11-09, 13:44:
I'd advise you not to use a more restrictive license than upstream uses.
Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to
debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of
this (link to fine documentation is welcomed)?
On 9 November 2012 12:44, Maykel Moya wrote:
> Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to
> debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of
> this (link to fine documentation is welcomed)?
>
I'm not sure if there's a Debian rule about it, but I'd co
El 08/11/12 23:08, Jakub Wilk escribió:
Hello
> I'd advise you not to use a more restrictive license than upstream uses.
Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to
debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of
this (link to fine documentation is w
Maykel Moya asked to join DPMT. Here's my preliminary review of pyxs,
the package he wants to maintain within the team. (Note that I don't
intend to sponsor this, sorry!)
I downloaded the package from:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyxs/pyxs_0.3+git20111205.793e02c0-2.dsc
There
9 matches
Mail list logo
