On Friday, August 02, 2013 09:13:56 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> python3.3 is the default python3. We're going straight to dropping
> python3.2 from supported python3 versions. binNMUs were already done for
> morse- simulator,postgresql-9.1,yafaray,and znc after python3.3 became
> default.
These issu
python3.3 is the default python3. We're going straight to dropping python3.2
from supported python3 versions. binNMUs were already done for morse-
simulator,postgresql-9.1,yafaray,and znc after python3.3 became default.
These issues still remain:
> libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but do
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 10:22:22 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 01:55:07 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, June 21, 2013 01:30:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > > Here's a further update on pack
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 01:55:07 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, June 21, 2013 01:30:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition:
> libguestfs - No longer FTBF
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 06:15:11 PM PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> >Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and
> >#711761.
> To my opinion, (I am the maintainer of pytango) this is not a problem if
> pytango is not available on s390. I forwarded the bug to the upstre
>Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and #711761.
To my opinion, (I am the maintainer of pytango) this is not a problem if
pytango is not available on s390.
I forwarded the bug to the upstream with a patch, I am waiting for the approval
of the upstream.
Nevertheless
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 02:04:08 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 03, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and
> >#711761.
> Don't forget #711761 and #711761.
>
> :)
Meh. #710545.
Scott K
> >I don't think they are enou
On Jul 03, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and #711761.
Don't forget #711761 and #711761.
:)
>I don't think they are enough of a reason to hold back switching to python3.3
>as default.
>
>My proposal is that once scipy
On Friday, June 21, 2013 01:30:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition:
> >
> libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but does on i386, #710545, now
> builds for all pytho
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition:
>
> libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but does on i386, #710545, now
> builds for all python3 versions
> nuitka FTBFS unrepoducible
pyepr builds successfull
Dnia 2013-06-19, śro o godzinie 00:53 -0400, Scott Kitterman pisze:
[ cut ]
> I've marked the things that I think block python3.3 as default a blocking the
> transition bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708536
>
pyopencl package fixing FTBFS #711926 (which block #708536
Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition:
boost1.49 Fixed
flufl.bounce builds now that zope.interface is updated
hivex FTBFS fixed, dependencies fixed, nothing further to do.
libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but does on i386, #710545, now builds
for all python3
Hi,
Gediminas Paulauskas writes:
> Please also upload zope.component 3.11.0 at the same time, to match a
> big move of code to zope.interface >= 3.8
Thanks, I have just uploaded these 4 packages.
Cheers,
--
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
pytango - Shouldn't have been removed, FTBFS on s390 - #711761
This bug was forwarded to the upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d4
On 13 June 2013 07:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 03:13:38 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> More updates and added all the "unknown" packages f
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 03:13:38 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> More updates and added all the "unknown" packages from the transition
> tracker. Items marked as fixed
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
More updates and added all the "unknown" packages from the transition tracker.
Items marked as fixed in the last update have been removed.
>
> > On Thursday, May 23,
2013/6/11 Arnaud Fontaine
> Hello,
>
> Arnaud Fontaine writes:
>
> > I can sponsor zope.interface upload if that's ok for Gediminas.
>
> I have prepared zope.interface for upload and noticed that tests fail
> with python 3.3 because of a bug in zope.exceptions fixed in 4.0.1 (only
> 4.0.0.1
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
Here's another update based on work I've done, noticed other people did, or
responses to the last one of these I sent. It does not include work which I
neither notice nor people told me about. Items marked as fixed in the last
upda
Hello,
Arnaud Fontaine writes:
> I can sponsor zope.interface upload if that's ok for Gediminas.
I have prepared zope.interface for upload and noticed that tests fail
with python 3.3 because of a bug in zope.exceptions fixed in 4.0.1 (only
4.0.0.1 is currently available in Debian). Thi
On Jun 07, 2013, at 05:27 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> zope.interface - Needs update to 4.0.2 or later
>>
>> Getting zope.interface updated would be helpful as well, but seems to
>> need sponsoring. If someone has some sponsoring cycles available,
>> please have a look.
>
>I can sponsor zop
Hello,
Scott Kitterman writes:
> zope.interface - Needs update to 4.0.2 or later
>
> Getting zope.interface updated would be helpful as well, but seems to
> need sponsoring. If someone has some sponsoring cycles available,
> please have a look.
I can sponsor zope.interface upload if that'
* Scott Kitterman , 2013-06-06, 12:46:
Did anyone file bugs for jwilk's FTBFS TODO packages?
I've file them all, with one exception:
I couldn't reproduce nuitka's FTBFS in a different build environment.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On 06.06.2013 19:04, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> python-scipy FTBFS with new Cython: #707315
and needs fixed numpy.
a new upstream which works with new cython is ready in svn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
* Scott Kitterman , 2013-06-06, 12:46:
mpi4py, pyepr, pystemmer, python-llfuse, python-scipy, and
python-astropy all needed a fixed cython, which is now available.
pyepr builds successfully, but puts dbg extensions into wrong package:
#708011
python-scipy FTBFS with new Cython: #707315
pytho
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 06:19:06 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I've been working on this a bit ...
>
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 02:01:26 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported
> > version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packa
Į will sync the rest of zope packages from ubuntu in a few days.
Anyone able to upload?
What is the latest snippet to add for python3 support?..
2013.05.25 01:36, "Barry Warsaw" rašė:
> On May 24, 2013, at 05:48 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:24:20AM -0400, Barry War
On May 24, 2013, at 05:48 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
>On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:24:20AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On May 07, 2013, at 02:01 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>
>> >flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086
>>
>> This one is really because of the ancient version of zope.interface in
>> sid/jessie. I
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:24:20AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 07, 2013, at 02:01 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> >flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086
>
> This one is really because of the ancient version of zope.interface in
> sid/jessie. It's not until z.i 4.0.2 that Python 3.3 support was added,
> a
On May 07, 2013, at 02:01 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086
This one is really because of the ancient version of zope.interface in
sid/jessie. It's not until z.i 4.0.2 that Python 3.3 support was added,
although 4.0.5 is the latest version in the Cheeseshop.
CC pkg-zope-develope
Quoting Scott Kitterman (2013-05-24 00:19:06)
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 02:01:26 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
[...]
> > pytest FTBFS TODO
Fixed
signature.asc
Description: signature
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Did anyone else fix stuff?
> cssutils FTBFS, needs rebuilt nosetests, then FTBFS #686340
Fixed.
> python-docutils FTBFS #681723
Excellently fixed by Jakub.
> pymarkups FTBFS TODO
No longer FTBFS with the latest docutils.
> python-flexmo
I've been working on this a bit ...
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 02:01:26 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
> python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported
> version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packages
> failing to build:
>
> boost1.49 FTBFS TODO
> boost1.50 FTBFS TOD
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:01:26PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a
> supported version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of
> packages failing to build:
>
> pyfits FTBFS, needs fixed python-numpy
I have a new upstream version read
* Jakub Wilk , 2013-05-07, 14:01:
Now we have dozens of packages failing to build:
I should have said that I initially tested only packages build-depending
on python3-all(-dev). There are also these, that build-depended only on
the default version:
pyinotify #692385
python-pip #692384
(and p
Thanks Jakub,
FWIW:
> cython produces broken code #681697
update WiP (for some reason did not build using python-dbg at all thus
dh_install failed... will troubleshoot shortly)
> nuitka FTBFS TODO
I believe fixed upstream -- if not -- will be, i.e. nothing to worry for
the team
--
Yaroslav O
python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported
version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packages
failing to build:
boost1.49 FTBFS TODO
boost1.50 FTBFS TODO
cairosvg FTBFS, needs fixed py3cairo
cracklib2 FTBFS #681749
cssutils FTBFS, needs rebuilt nosetest
37 matches
Mail list logo
