On Thursday, October 06, 2011 08:50:30 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Thomas Waldmann wrote:
> > Considering that it'll take a while until wheezy gets stable, I hope
> > there is also a python 3.x (x=rather latest) then, so that projects can
> > do a python
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Thomas Waldmann wrote:
> Considering that it'll take a while until wheezy gets stable, I hope
> there is also a python 3.x (x=rather latest) then, so that projects can
> do a python3 migration without running into basic issues then.
3.2 is already there.
-
Cool!
Not for squeeze (as I discussed recently), but it is nice to hear that
we don't have the same "no python 2.7" issue in wheezy, but even have it
as default then.
Considering that it'll take a while until wheezy gets stable, I hope
there is also a python 3.x (x=rather latest) then, so that pr
Hi,
as of the just finished britney run, the /usr/bin/python symlink points
to python2.7 in wheezy.
In this process, a number of packages had to be removed from testing to
avoid more waiting time and complications. They should be able to
migrate back quickly on their own, but if you maintain one
4 matches
Mail list logo