On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:21:55PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:13:08AM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I sent a mail to the list a couple of weeks ago about the relationships
> > between the python and python-unit packages, and did not receive any
> > a
it (as show by apt-cache showpkg
> python-unit) or any of the versioned packages, I think it is safe to
> remove the python-unit package.
Zope has a suggest on python-unit. It should either have the explicit
version with python2.1-unit or remove the suggestion.
> Is there any objection to my
unittest.py in the packages database).
Since noone depends on python-unit (as show by apt-cache showpkg
python-unit) or any of the versioned packages, I think it is safe to
remove the python-unit package.
Is there any objection to my filing a bug against python-unit asking for
its removal
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:45:39PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> * if so, do we drop support for pyunit in python1.5, or add pyunit as a
> patch?
Forget this line: the pyunit package is not built for python1.5.
Alexandre Fayolle
--
LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab.com http://www.logi
the python-unit package be generated from the python source
package?
* if so, do we drop support for pyunit in python1.5, or add pyunit as a
patch?
* if not, should I generate python-unit packages based on the CVS?
* or should I ask upstream to make a release?
Thanks for your feedback.
Alexand
5 matches
Mail list logo
