On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:50:03PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Toni Mueller , 2010-08-09, 14:00:
> >while packaging a new version of funkload and trying to convert the
> >packaging to the new 3.0 format, I have now arrived at a package that
> >should work. At least, superficially inspecting the pa
* Toni Mueller , 2010-08-09, 16:38:
http://download.oeko.net/sw/misc/funkload/
Drop ", << 3.0" from XS-Python-Version. It's not needed and confuses
python-support.
I've done that, but with no effect. The unpacked control file now
reads:
after reading the recent thread about XS-Python-Versio
Hi,
one more data point:
On Mon, 09.08.2010 at 16:38:07 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I'm very hesitant to upload a package that I cannot install locally,
> but would really like to see this version in the archive.
for kicks, I installed this package on my Testing workstation w/o any
problems:
Hi,
On Mon, 09.08.2010 at 16:09:48 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 09.08.2010 at 15:48:18 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > http://download.oeko.net/sw/misc/funkload/
> > Drop ", << 3.0" from XS-Python-Version. It's not needed and confuses
> > python-support.
>
> I've done that, but with no
Hi,
On Mon, 09.08.2010 at 15:48:18 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > http://download.oeko.net/sw/misc/funkload/
> Drop ", << 3.0" from XS-Python-Version. It's not needed and confuses
> python-support.
I've done that, but with no effect. The unpacked control file now
reads:
Package: funkload
Version
* Toni Mueller , 2010-08-09, 15:34:
>But trying to actually install the package on a machine running
>Sid, current as of today, fails:
Could you share your source package with us? Or at least post
debdiff (limited to debian/ directory) between the version in the
archive and the one which fails?
Hi Jakub,
On Mon, 09.08.2010 at 14:50:03 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Toni Mueller , 2010-08-09, 14:00:
> >But trying to actually install the package on a machine running
> >Sid, current as of today, fails:
>
> Could you share your source package with us? Or at least post
> debdiff (limited to
* Toni Mueller , 2010-08-09, 14:00:
while packaging a new version of funkload and trying to convert the
packaging to the new 3.0 format, I have now arrived at a package that
should work. At least, superficially inspecting the package's contents
does not reveal any errors, as does running lintian
Hi,
while packaging a new version of funkload and trying to convert the
packaging to the new 3.0 format, I have now arrived at a package that
should work. At least, superficially inspecting the package's contents
does not reveal any errors, as does running lintian (the package is
almost lintian-c
9 matches
Mail list logo
