On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:11:41PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:45:07PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > It may be that as python is simpler, we can simply have a script in a
> > > python-common package which does something like (pardon me if I get
> > [... sample scri
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:45:07PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > It may be that as python is simpler, we can simply have a script in a
> > python-common package which does something like (pardon me if I get
> [... sample scripts...]
>
> It's funny how minds think alike... did you write these be
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:17:16PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:19:56PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > > Why not take the emacsen-common method and code and use this for
> > > > python? It probably won't work for C-extension modules, but it could
> > > > make life e
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:19:56PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > Why not take the emacsen-common method and code and use this for
> > > python? It probably won't work for C-extension modules, but it could
> > > make life easier for pure Python ones.
>
> Just a thought; since we already have
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:28:50AM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
>
> For Python Policy 2.2.3, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2002/debian-python-200201/m
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:28:50AM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
>
> For Python Policy 2.2.3, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2002/debian-python-200201/m
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
For Python Policy 2.2.3, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2002/debian-python-200201/msg00019.html
I am working on this. I have the previous version online at
http:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 02:08:56PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
> >
> > Need: a python-module (pure Python) providing package should provide
> > byte-compiled versions
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
>
> Need: a python-module (pure Python) providing package should provide
> byte-compiled versions for all installed python versions (as long as
> there are no version depen
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
...
> Why not take the emacsen-common method and code and use this for
> python? It probably won't work for C-extension modules, but it could
> make life easier for pure Py
I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
Need: a python-module (pure Python) providing package should provide
byte-compiled versions for all installed python versions (as long as
there are no version dependency issues)
Parallel: an emacs-module providing package should provide
11 matches
Mail list logo
