Bug#1089649: lintian: does not complain about trailing comma in Maintainer field

2024-12-10 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Package: lintian Version: 2.120.0 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: hert...@debian.org, daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org, debian-common-l...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org, The Maintainer field is only allowed to have a single contact. When you put two, you get a "too

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 9/6/07, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > So I myself chose to be among Uploaders and set Maintainer to DPMT, > > > > because this more enforces team work and I like team work. > > > > > I had a discussion on #debian-devel about this,

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > So I myself chose to be among Uploaders and set Maintainer to DPMT, > > > because this more enforces team work and I like team work. > > > I had a discussion on #debian-devel about this, and "they" thought it > > was pretty stupid to have DPMT as up

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On 9/6/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one* > > > person named as the responsible party for the packages. > > > It's a fact of human psychology tha

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 9/6/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one* > > person named as the responsible party for the packages. > > > > It's a fact of human psychology that if a collective group is named as > > the responsible party, then nob

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
> This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one* > person named as the responsible party for the packages. > > It's a fact of human psychology that if a collective group is named as > the responsible party, then nobody in that group feels particularly > responsible. This is on

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-04 Thread Ben Finney
"Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At the moment, it's set to me, but it seems to me it's better for > everybody, if it is rather set to DPMT, since that way everyone > should feel encouraged to fix things in all DPMT packages. The bug reports are available, for those looking for thing

maintainer field

2007-09-04 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, should the maintainer field of DPMT packages that I created be set to me, or the Debian Python Modules Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ? At the moment, it's set to me, but it seems to me it's better for everybody, if it is rather set to DPMT, since that way everyone should feel e