Hi,
I have a large Java package (as a jar in /usr/share/java) that is
accompanied with some Jython intergration (Python file). Upstream provides
a small script that adds the jar to the classpath, and starts jython
with a local python.path.
How should I package this for Jython?
* where should
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan the jython package.
Jython is an implementation of the high-level, dynamic, object-oriented
language Python seamlessly integrated with the Java platform. The
predecessor to Jython, JPython, is certified as 100% Pure Java.
.
Jython is
--- Begin Message ---
Last night I formally put the jython package up for adoption (#315289).
The reasons are because my time is rather more constrained than it used
to be, and because I have increasingly little to do with java these
days.
Since jython is a non-trivial piece of software, it
> And there is no upstream version for Python 2.3?
Not even for 2.2.
> Anyway, in this case, I guess the package should be called "jython2.1"
> instead of "jython". And maybe a meta-package providing Jython should be
> uploaded too?
It all seems a bit much, gi
I originally sent a question about this to debian-java, guess maybe I
should've asked here.
I have "jdk1.1" and "jython" packages installed. Curiously, when I run the
Jython interpreter interactively it doesn't accept indentation (which makes
it nearly useless fo
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:44:33AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
| To add to the multiple python versions confusion:
| jython recently appeared in debian.
| To make things correctly, it should be possible to
| use it as replacement of python, and also it should be
| possible to have both python
To add to the multiple python versions confusion:
jython recently appeared in debian.
To make things correctly, it should be possible to
use it as replacement of python, and also it should be
possible to have both python and jython installed
simultaneously.
and, of course, C modules and many
> > Hi. On the topic of Jython, I received this from jython-dev (see below)
> > - so it seems the GPL incompatibility is not likely to go away any time
> > soon.
>
> does it matter?
There is at least one small hassle (which can be a large hassle for the
command-lin
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. On the topic of Jython, I received this from jython-dev (see below) - so
> it seems the GPL incompatibility is not likely to go away any time soon.
>
does it matter?
the licence is DFSG compliant, and the main
Hi. On the topic of Jython, I received this from jython-dev (see below) - so
it seems the GPL incompatibility is not likely to go away any time soon.
Ben.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Jython-dev] Jython license and GPL incompatibility
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 20:49
> Perhaps there's an volunteer somewhere who'd like to give Jython a look and
> start packaging it.
Assuming the offer's still standing, I'm happy to have a go. I find it
useful.
Ben.
--
Ben Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://baasil.humbug.org.
Hi,
the BTS still holds my ITP to package JPython (nowadays called Jython).
Jython is an implementation of the Python language in pure Java, see
http://www.jython.org/.
As much as I'm interested in the issues involved with a painless coexistence
of C-Python and Jython on Debian, I haven
12 matches
Mail list logo
