Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Emil,
>Actually it is probably something else. I had a user with YellowDog
> Linux 2.3 try sparky against python 2.1.1 and tcl 8.3.3 and he segfaults
> as well. Are you on i386 or ppc debian? If i386, I would be very interested
> if sparky segfaults o
Emil,
Actually it is probably something else. I had a user with YellowDog
Linux 2.3 try sparky against python 2.1.1 and tcl 8.3.3 and he segfaults
as well. Are you on i386 or ppc debian? If i386, I would be very interested
if sparky segfaults on that arch as well. It has been built on redhat
lin
Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe I may have a clue as to why sparky is segfaulting in
> when run as a python extension. The upstream maintainer is using
> python 2.1.1 and tcl 8.3.4 so I built against our python 2.1.3 and
> tck 8.3.3. However I just noticed that sid's pytho
I believe I may have a clue as to why sparky is segfaulting in
when run as a python extension. The upstream maintainer is using
python 2.1.1 and tcl 8.3.4 so I built against our python 2.1.3 and
tck 8.3.3. However I just noticed that sid's python2.1 is in
fact built against tcl-8.4 now. Could t
4 matches
Mail list logo