On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> (I am reading this to mean “the reference version of the Debian Python
> policy is in the python-defaults package”.)
>
> Okay. Clearly one way for this to improve would be for some of those bug
> reports to be responded to by the maintainer.
>
>
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would
> > like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
>
> Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored.
> I’m a
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:02:21 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote:
>Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
>> Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like
>> to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
>
>Bug reports concerning the Python policy have b
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would
> > like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
>
> Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored.
> I’m a
Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like
> to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored. I’m
afraid this will last as long as the re
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:50:00 +0300 anatoly techtonik wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>
>> I'm not aware of any ongoing work. I would be willing to help work on such
>> a thing, but we currently lack a good mechanism for developing/approving
>> such a policy.
>
>Wit
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> I'm not aware of any ongoing work. I would be willing to help work on such
> a thing, but we currently lack a good mechanism for developing/approving
> such a policy.
With clear policy and precise goal you won't need approving mechanism
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:22:47 +1100 Ben Finney
wrote:
>Luca Falavigna writes:
>
>> Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
>> > Since we currently lack anything like a maintained Python policy, I
>> > think this is putting the cart before the horse. [ &]
>
>> [ &] we could wait for the new policy to be draft
Luca Falavigna writes:
> Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
> > Since we currently lack anything like a maintained Python policy, I
> > think this is putting the cart before the horse. […]
> […] we could wait for the new policy to be drafted, I'm not sure when
> this will happen, though.
I don't know
9 matches
Mail list logo
