On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 11:58:28 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Is there a reason why one would use Python2-sphinx instead of the Python
> 3 version?
src:dbus-python has more Python 2 API than Python 3 API (some objects
cease to exist in Python 3 builds). As long as python-dbus.deb exists,
it's some
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:58:28AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Is there a reason why one would use Python2-sphinx instead of the Python
> 3 version? How often in these 314 cases it is not just used as an
> executable in d/rules?
One possible reason is when sphinx.ext.autodoc is in use for docume
Dmitry Shachnev writes:
> Sphinx 2.0 will also drop Python 2.7 support, so I am going to make the
> “sphinx” source package ship only python3-sphinx, and introduce the new
> source package (“sphinx-python2”?) which will ship only python-sphinx.
>
> Eventually I will also do a mass bug filing, but
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:32:23AM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > This also means finding
> > solutions for edge-cases such as astroid, whose 2.0 branch is the only to
> > support Py3.7, but also drops 2.x support.
>
> this is becoming less of an edge-case and more the current situation
> of several
4 matches
Mail list logo
