Re: Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

2011-06-01 Thread Andriy Senkovych
Hello, Bernd. Thank you for your reply, answers inline: 2011/6/1 Bernd Zeimetz : >> This approach is tested and may be observed on my test site [6]. It >> allows me to test package building during the same CI process as >> development because package will be rebuilt on both upstream VCS >> update

Re: Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

2011-06-01 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, On 05/31/2011 01:59 PM, Andriy Senkovych wrote: > 1) get debian package sources (I use git-buildpackage) from one of the > repositories[4,5] > 2) get the new tarball. this is done in two steps: > a) get a slightly modified debian/watch file which points to the > right place where we uploaded

Re: Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

2011-06-01 Thread Gergely Nagy
Toni Mueller writes: > On Tue, 31.05.2011 at 14:59:25 +0300, Andriy Senkovych > wrote: >> I'm an uploader of the buildbot and buildbot-slave Debian packages and >> a contributor to the buildbot project[1] itself. As you may wonder, >> buildbot is a distributed continious integration tool writte

Re: Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

2011-06-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Andriy, On Tue, 31.05.2011 at 14:59:25 +0300, Andriy Senkovych wrote: > I'm an uploader of the buildbot and buildbot-slave Debian packages and > a contributor to the buildbot project[1] itself. As you may wonder, > buildbot is a distributed continious integration tool written in > Python. An

Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

2011-05-31 Thread Andriy Senkovych
Dear mentors, I'm an uploader of the buildbot and buildbot-slave Debian packages and a contributor to the buildbot project[1] itself. As you may wonder, buildbot is a distributed continious integration tool written in Python. And since this is a continious integration tool, it would be great if it