Re: Updated python-happydoc to policy

2001-10-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > Uh, yes, they are equivalent. > Ah, yes, given that the Python-Policy only allows one default > Python interpreter, not more than one. Given that dpkg allows only one package called "foo" to be installed

Re: Updated python-happydoc to policy

2001-10-29 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
Anthony Towns wrote: Uh, yes, they are equivalent. Ah, yes, given that the Python-Policy only allows one default Python interpreter, not more than one. Greetings, Bastian

Re: Updated python-happydoc to policy

2001-10-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Harry Henry Gebel wrote: > > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used > > 'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)' > No, this is not equivalent! Uh, yes, they are equivalent. > The

Re: Updated python-happydoc to policy

2001-10-29 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
Hi. Harry Henry Gebel wrote: 'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used 'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)' No, this is not equivalent! The Conflict means that I cannot install happydoc and python2.2 simultaneously, and this is not desired. I know t

Updated python-happydoc to policy

2001-10-29 Thread Harry Henry Gebel
I updated python-happydoc to the proposed policy and uploaded it to ftp-master.debian.org:/home/doko/www/python-uploads/ . Lintian marked 'Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2)' as an error; so I used 'Depends: python (>= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (>= 2.2)' -- Harry Henry Gebel West Dover