On 28 November 2010 00:18, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Floris Bruynooghe , 2010-11-28, 00:06:
>>
>> So now that these have been filed, is there a consensus on what to do
>> if only documentation is affected?
>
> How about, well, fixing it? :) It's not like correcting documentation is
> rocket science.
* Floris Bruynooghe , 2010-11-28, 00:06:
So now that these have been filed, is there a consensus on what to do
if only documentation is affected?
How about, well, fixing it? :) It's not like correcting documentation is
rocket science.
In any case I don't think it's RC or warrants an upload
[Sandro: sorry for the mistaken private reply]
On 27 November 2010 22:50, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:50, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-17, 23:37:
Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
>>>
>>> I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
>>
>> Any news on tha
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 00:13, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-27, 23:50:
>
> Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
>>>
>>> Any news on that? :)
>>
>> FSVO "tomorrow": done ;)
>>
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?t
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-27, 23:50:
Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
Any news on that? :)
FSVO "tomorrow": done ;)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pythonpath;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Thanks a bunch!
Though I see somet
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:50, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-17, 23:37:
>>>
>>> Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
>>
>> I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
>
> Any news on that? :)
FSVO "tomorrow": done ;)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pythonpath;users=debia
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-17, 23:37:
Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
Any news on that? :)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
* Mike Hommey , 2010-11-18, 12:17:
A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment
variable in an insecure way. They do something like:
PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
This is wrong, because if PYTHONPATH were originally unset or empty,
current working directory wou
Hello, everybody,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:36:59AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 21 novembre 2010, vers
> 16:37, Filippo Rusconi disait :
>
> > OK, so I may test if the content of the PYTHONPATH variable is empty
> > the way below, so that I c
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 21 novembre 2010, vers
16:37, Filippo Rusconi disait :
> OK, so I may test if the content of the PYTHONPATH variable is empty
> the way below, so that I can set the path in differenciated manners :
> ~~ start-script ~~~
> #!/bin/
Hello, Pythonistas,
in my slow learning of Python and of Python program packaging, here am
I again asking for advice:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment
> variable in an insecure way. They do something
On Friday 19,November,2010 03:47 AM, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Hello, Pythonistas,
>
> in my slow learning of Python and of Python program packaging, here am
> I again asking for advice:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> A number of packages in the archive sets the
Hello, Pythonistas,
in my slow learning of Python and of Python program packaging, here am
I again asking for advice:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment
> variable in an insecure way. They do something
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:04:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 22:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment
> >> variable
> >> in an insecure way. They do something like:
> >>
> >> PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 22:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment variable
>> in an insecure way. They do something like:
>>
>> PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
>>
>> This is wrong, because if PYTHONPATH were originally unset or empty,
Hi all,
here below the mail Jakub sent to d-python yesterday, I'm bouncing it
now to d-d now to wider spread and as a notification of an upcoming
mbf (if no stop comes it's expected to happen this evening). Please
follow the whole thread at [1] for further discussion (and keep d-p in
the loop in ca
Hi all,
here below the mail Jakub sent to d-python yesterday, I'm bouncing it
now to d-d now to wider spread and as a notification of an upcoming
mbf (if no stop comes it's expected to happen this evening). Please
follow the whole thread at [1] for further discussion (and keep d-p in
the loop in ca
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-17, 23:37:
Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
Thanks.
Severity? grave for the vulnerable packages, important for the others?
I think so.
in this case, was release team already contacted about that? I don't
think this mini-R
Hi Jakub & all others,
nice to see you back at full force :)
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 22:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Any volunteers to file bugs? :)
I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me.
Severity? grave for the vulnerable packages, important for the others?
in this case, was release team alread
Hello,
> * python2.7-examples (2.7-9)
> * python3.1-examples (3.1.2+20100926-1, 3.1.2+20101012-1)
> * python3.2-examples (3.2~a3-1)
For the person reporting those: If they need to be forwarded upstream,
feel free to cc: me in the bug report and I’ll do it.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment
variable in an insecure way. They do something like:
PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
This is wrong, because if PYTHONPATH were originally unset or empty,
current working directory would be added to sys.path.
These pa
21 matches
Mail list logo
