Re: Third round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-12-10 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 10, 2012, at 02:33 PM, Bradley M. Froehle wrote: >Interesting, the LibraryStyleGuide [1] suggests a plain `=` and the >AppStyleGuide [2] suggests `:=`. (The difference of course is that `=` >does delayed evaluation meaning the command is run once for every time the >variable is needed, and

Re: Third round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-12-10 Thread Bradley M. Froehle
Interesting, the LibraryStyleGuide [1] suggests a plain `=` and the AppStyleGuide [2] suggests `:=`. (The difference of course is that `=` does delayed evaluation meaning the command is run once for every time the variable is needed, and `:=` does immediate evaluation meaning the command is run on

Re: Third round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-12-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Tomás Di Domenico , 2012-12-09, 22:27: I have also tried my hand at generating a Python3 binary package, which seems to be working. I would appreciate if someone could take a look at the debian/rules file and tell me how to improve it. I'm sure my very simple version is not doing all that can

Third round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-12-09 Thread Tomás Di Domenico
Greetings, all! Here I am again looking for guidance on my first packaging attempt. Thanks to Dmitry's help, I got the DEP8 testing in place. I have also removed the pickled files that Jakub detected: they are generated upon runing the tests if they don't exists, and they will be removed from futu