"Sandro Tosi" wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>thanks for bringing this up (again :) ).
>
>On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 22:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> As I had said I would after the last round, I asked the release team about
>> any
>> specific requirements they might have for Python version specification. T
Hi Scott,
thanks for bringing this up (again :) ).
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 22:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> As I had said I would after the last round, I asked the release team about any
> specific requirements they might have for Python version specification. They
> don't. My summary of the thr
"Scott Kitterman" wrote:
>As I had said I would after the last round, I asked the release team about any
>specific requirements they might have for Python version specification. They
>don't. My summary of the thread is "We want it to be easy". The thread
>starts here for those interested:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 06:02 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>I don't want to break a lot of packages. Both implicit and explicit
>all are widely used in Python packages. I think we have more freedom
>to do the "right" thing for Python 3.
That's what I expected (i.e. "cleans up a wart"). +1
Thanks,
-Ba
"Barry Warsaw" wrote:
>On Jun 30, 2010, at 04:58 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 04:51:38 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>>> [Scott Kitterman, 2010-06-30]
>>>
>>> > For Python3:
>>> >
>>> > 1. A new field called X-Python3-Version: It does not support lists of
>>> > ver
On Jun 30, 2010, at 04:58 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 04:51:38 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> [Scott Kitterman, 2010-06-30]
>>
>> > For Python3:
>> >
>> > 1. A new field called X-Python3-Version: It does not support lists of
>> > versions (e.g. (3.0, 3.1)). Acceptabl
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 04:51:38 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Scott Kitterman, 2010-06-30]
>
> > For Python3:
> >
> > 1. A new field called X-Python3-Version: It does not support lists of
> > versions (e.g. (3.0, 3.1)). Acceptable values are a single version (e.g
> > 3.1), greater than or
[Scott Kitterman, 2010-06-30]
> For Python3:
>
> 1. A new field called X-Python3-Version: It does not support lists of
> versions (e.g. (3.0, 3.1)). Acceptable values are a single version (e.g
> 3.1),
> greater than or equal to a version (e.g. >= 3.1), or strictly less than a
> version (e.g
As I had said I would after the last round, I asked the release team about any
specific requirements they might have for Python version specification. They
don't. My summary of the thread is "We want it to be easy". The thread
starts here for those interested:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-
9 matches
Mail list logo
