* Stephan Peijnik [Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:07:40 +0100]:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:27 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]:
> > > Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely
> > > free anyways I thought I could get rid of this p
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:27 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]:
>
> > Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely
> > free anyways I thought I could get rid of this problem by simply
> > removing the w32-specifics when repacka
* Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]:
> Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely
> free anyways I thought I could get rid of this problem by simply
> removing the w32-specifics when repackaging the dfsg version of the
> tarball.
What about just not insta
Hello debian-python and DPMT,
I have just noticed that a bug against one of the packages I help
maintaining was reported [0] over at Launchpad that is caused by
w32-specific code shipping with my package (python-pyglet).
Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely
free an
4 matches
Mail list logo