On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:04:00 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 04:52 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> >> Is #4 really that horrible?
> >>
> >IMO, yes.
>
> https://github.com/nose-devs/nose/issues/634
>
> captures a proposal that Dmitry made on #ubuntu-devel, which seems good to
On Feb 26, 2013, at 04:52 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Is #4 really that horrible?
>>
>IMO, yes.
https://github.com/nose-devs/nose/issues/634
captures a proposal that Dmitry made on #ubuntu-devel, which seems good to
me. I'll bring this issue up on the tip list.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:32:56 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>
> >1. Status quo: Provide a nosetests-3.X script for the default version at
> > build time.
> > Pros: None
> > Cons:
> > - This potentially breaks unit tests if there are tw
On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>1. Status quo: Provide a nosetests-3.X script for the default version at
> build time.
> Pros: None
> Cons:
> - This potentially breaks unit tests if there are two supported 3.x
> versions.
>2. Drop all nosetsts-3.X scripts.
> Pros
Hi Barry (2013.02.22_15:38:46_+0200)
> Is there no better way to provide nosetests-X.Y scripts with the
> proper shebang lines for all supported Python versions?
Oh, and one more thing. If you have a C extension, and want to run your
tests on the DEBUG builds of python, you need nosetests-X.Y-dbg
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> did you also check the autopkgtest directories?
> e.g. pyzmq in svn (not yet uploaded) currently uses nosetests-3.x in the
> autopkgtests but not in debian/rules.
Hi Julian,
I was checking both debian/rules and debian/tests/*, but only for
Hi Barry (2013.02.22_15:38:46_+0200)
> >As discussed yesterday on IRC, nose's /usr/bin/nosetests-3.x scripts are
> >broken (provided only for python3 version(s) that was/were default on
> >build time)
>
> Sorry, can you please provide more detail for folks who were not participating
> in the IRC d
On 22 February 2013 06:28, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> After looking at all packages that build-depend on python3-nose, I've
> identified these packages as needing fix:
>
I happen to recall that python-xdg is also affected, both in debian/rules
[1] and autopkgtests [2].
I'm happy to update that, b
Thanks for the heads up!
I've checked reverse build-dependencies in sid only, in experimental
there are more matching packages, but only pyxdg needs fixing.
Surprisingly, many packages are already using the right way.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> O
On Feb 22, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>As discussed yesterday on IRC, nose's /usr/bin/nosetests-3.x scripts are
>broken (provided only for python3 version(s) that was/were default on
>build time)
Sorry, can you please provide more detail for folks who were not participating
in the
On 02/22/2013 07:28 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed yesterday on IRC, nose's /usr/bin/nosetests-3.x scripts are
> broken (provided only for python3 version(s) that was/were default on
> build time), and instead of writing hacks to fix that we have decided to
> instead remove thos
Hi,
As discussed yesterday on IRC, nose's /usr/bin/nosetests-3.x scripts are
broken (provided only for python3 version(s) that was/were default on
build time), and instead of writing hacks to fix that we have decided to
instead remove those scripts and make packages use
"python3.x /usr/bin/nosetes
12 matches
Mail list logo
