Re: Remaining numpy 1.24 issues on 32bit architectures

Hi Nilesh, Am Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 05:07:37PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:12:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I made some tiny steps forward ("only" 84 failures instead of 89 when I > > wrote my first mail) in the numpy 1.24 migration for 32bit architectures > >

Re: Remaining numpy 1.24 issues on 32bit architectures

Hi, On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:12:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I made some tiny steps forward ("only" 84 failures instead of 89 when I > wrote my first mail) in the numpy 1.24 migration for 32bit architectures > but I'm facing issues I do not have a real clue for. In > > > https://sals

Re: Remaining numpy 1.24 issues on 32bit architectures

Hi, I made some tiny steps forward ("only" 84 failures instead of 89 when I wrote my first mail) in the numpy 1.24 migration for 32bit architectures but I'm facing issues I do not have a real clue for. In https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-skbio/-/blob/master/debian/patches/numpy-1.24.

Remaining numpy 1.24 issues on 32bit architectures

Hi, I think there are some remaining issues with numpy 1.24 migration on 32 bit architectures[1]. Here is one example: _ TestSequence.test_getitem_with_slice_has_positional_metadata _ self = def test_getitem_with_slice_has_positional_metadata(self): s = "0123456789