On Sep 05, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>From my point of view, since you're anyway using features of
>git-buildpackage, it would be better to improve git-buildpackage...
>I like how git-dpm can keep patches applied on the packaging
>branch and porting the required shell to "gbp pq" s
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Even with those complaints, git-dpm feels like the better tool for team
> package management in git. The problems are minor and probably easily
> fixable.
>From my point of view, since you're anyway using features of
git-buildpackage, it would be better
I've done enough experimentation to feel confident in my opinion that the team
should adopt git-dpm as its git packaging regime.
Note that this is just my personal opinion. I look forward to feedback from
other team members and interested parties, either for or against my
recommendation. I've on
3 matches
Mail list logo
