Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 14, 2012, at 01:27 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >It would be nice to have it in Experimental though. There are some bits of >multi-version support for Python 3 that still need work and we could work on >that with 3.3 and a new python3-defaults in experimental. +1 -Barry -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 04:02:40 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > On 14/03/12 15:40, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > It would be nice to build for all supported Python 3 versions. Python > > 3.3 is currently scheduled for August of this year, but I'm hoping > > we'll start seeing it show up in Debian aroun

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 14 March 2012 16:02, Simon McVittie wrote: > That's too late for it to be relevant for Wheezy, tbh. I don't think a > first beta should be in a Debian stable release, and the release team > hopes to freeze in June (at which point advancing from beta to final is > not a thing that should happen

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Simon McVittie
On 14/03/12 15:40, Barry Warsaw wrote: > It would be nice to build for all supported Python 3 versions. Python 3.3 is > currently scheduled for August of this year, but I'm hoping we'll start seeing > it show up in Debian around the time of the first beta in June. That's too late for it to be rel

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: >You changed the packaging to build for all supported Python 3 versions, >rather than only the default (although I think only 3.2 is currently >supported, anyway). I'd originally had it like that, but when I looked at >the PyQt4 packaging, it was

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:41:32 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 14 March 2012 04:13, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I did have to make some additional changes, such as using a policy > > compliant > > binary name in python3, as we did for PyQt4 (python3-pyqt4.qsci) and > > using dh_sip3 for the py

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-14 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 14 March 2012 04:13, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I did have to make some additional changes, such as using a policy > compliant > binary name in python3, as we did for PyQt4 (python3-pyqt4.qsci) and using > dh_sip3 for the python3 package. You can see the details in the DPMT SVN > if > you want.

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:27:01 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote: > Following on from tornado, the attached patch updates the packaging for > qscintilla2 to build Python 3 bindings. It's roughly following the > python-qt4 packaging (which it depends on). I did have to make some additional changes, such

Re: qscintilla2: package Python 3 bindings

2012-03-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:27:01 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote: > Following on from tornado, the attached patch updates the packaging for > qscintilla2 to build Python 3 bindings. It's roughly following the > python-qt4 packaging (which it depends on). Except for the Python/Python 2 parts (it's a non