Re: python packaging questions

2008-01-16 Thread Eike Nicklas
Thanks a lot to all of you, that clarified things for me! On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:10:11 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 16 janvier 2008 à 00:31 +0100, Eike Nicklas a écrit : > > * Which value should the XS-Python-Version field have to ensure easy > > transitions of future Python vers

Re: python packaging questions

2008-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 16 janvier 2008 à 00:31 +0100, Eike Nicklas a écrit : > * Which value should the XS-Python-Version field have to ensure easy > transitions of future Python versions? I tried using 'all', but then > my (binary) package depended for example on python2.3-gtk2, > python2.4-gtk2 and py

Re: python packaging questions

2008-01-15 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du mercredi 16 janvier 2008, vers 02:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> * For specifying supported Python versions, the policy recommends using >> XS/B-Python, whereas the python-support documentation recommends >> debian/pyversions. Wh

Re: python packaging questions

2008-01-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Eike Nicklas wrote: > Hi Debian Python experts, > > I am currently trying to create Debian packages for a small python > application I am writing. I thinks, this application is not yet ready > for an official inclusion in Debian, but still, I have some questions > about 'proper' packaging just out

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Python packaging questions]

2006-02-05 Thread Kai Hendry
On 2006-02-04T10:13+0900 Sanghyeon Seo wrote: > # Python distutils script for Debian package > # Seo Sanghyeon > > from distutils.core import setup > setup(packages=[ > 'simpleparse', > 'simpleparse.common', > 'simpleparse.xml', > ]) > > That's all. > > setup.py is a good idea in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Python packaging questions]

2006-02-04 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 10:13 +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote: > But in case of feedparser and web.py, aren't they just a single file? > I can't blame upstream for not interested in setup.py. I'm not sure > what Joe Wreschnig means when he says it's "unmanagable". I think > simple dh_install is fine for a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Python packaging questions]

2006-02-03 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
2006/2/4, Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am new to python packaging and I'm a little concerned about this > 'setup.py'. > > It duplicates debian/control. So whilst maintaining one I have to worry > about keeping debian/control and that setup.py in sync. Argh! > > I'm not even sure *where* and

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Python packaging questions]

2006-02-03 Thread Kai Hendry
From: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Python packaging questions Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:15:06 +0900 Reply-To: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please On 2006-02-01T11:43-0600 Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On W