On Jun 22, 2013, at 07:28 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
>are the enums already stable enough for backports?
>3.4 is still quite a while away.
I think so, yes. The PEP 435 has been accepted and the code is in 3.4's
Mercurial tree[1]. I have a branch adaptings Mailman 3 from using flufl.enum
to enum34
On 22.06.2013 19:19, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I filed an ITP to package enum34, which is the backport of Python 3.4's enum
> package:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712881
are the enums already stable enough for backports?
3.4 is still quite a while away.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
2 matches
Mail list logo