Re: pip for stretch

2016-11-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 28, 2016, at 01:56 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >I'm starting to work on pip 9.0.1 but noticed two new dependencies. appdirs >1.4.0 we have, but distro 1.0.1 we don't. It doesn't look like there's an ITP >for that, so I'll file that bug. Okay, as soon as python-distro clears new, I'll upload

Re: pip for stretch

2016-11-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 21, 2016, at 06:37 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: >As one might expect, I would prefer it if folks got 9.0.1 as quickly as >possible. In particular the feature that makes it easier for upstreams to >drop Python 2 support is one that is really only effective when people can >consider pip 9 a "mini

Re: pip for stretch

2016-11-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Donald Stufft: >> >> On Nov 21, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> >> I have not started to look at what if anything needs to be done to transition >> to pip 9, but if you have a strong opinion one way or the other, please weigh >> in. >> > > > As one might expect, I would prefer it if f

Re: pip for stretch

2016-11-21 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-11-21 18:33:48 -0500 (-0500), Barry Warsaw wrote: [...] > I have not started to look at what if anything needs to be done to > transition to pip 9, but if you have a strong opinion one way or > the other, please weigh in. The fix to uninstall properly when replacing with an editable instal

Re: pip for stretch

2016-11-21 Thread Donald Stufft
> > On Nov 21, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > I have not started to look at what if anything needs to be done to transition > to pip 9, but if you have a strong opinion one way or the other, please weigh > in. > As one might expect, I would prefer it if folks got 9.0.1 as quickly a