On 31 March 2014 18:54, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Note that Brian is also a DD and maintainer of various packages. He should
> be
> aware of the process. :)
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=bam
Need to think about it if is worth while for Debian as a whole.
I am starting to get an ac
On 31 March 2014 20:03, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > (I think this might have been renamed recently to python-sh, but can't
> find
> > the reference right now)
>
Here is the reference:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pbs/0.110
Maybe we should be removing the existing python-pbs from Debian? It look
[Brian May, 2014-03-31]
> *If* I wanted to get the following package into Debian:
>
> https://oss.trac.surfsara.nl/pbs_python
>
> What should I do?
>
> It seems to clash with a package of the same name (when labelled according
> to policy anyway) that is very different:
>
> https://packages.deb
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:20:42PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > *If* I wanted to get the following package into Debian:
> > https://oss.trac.surfsara.nl/pbs_python
> >
> > What should I do?
>
> First step: submit a Request For Package bug report against the s
Brian May writes:
> Hello,
>
> *If* I wanted to get the following package into Debian:
> https://oss.trac.surfsara.nl/pbs_python
>
> What should I do?
First step: submit a Request For Package bug report against the special
“wnpp” package https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/>. It is highly
recommen
5 matches
Mail list logo
