On Oct 06, 2015, at 03:12 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
>What CI tools are you using with GitLab CE?
We don't run CE; we use the hosted EE at gitlab.com. But anyway, we have a
custom VM on which we run the GitLab runner software in a docker image. This
runs our test suite in all supported Python 3s aga
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 06, 2015, at 07:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>>Interesting. It's the first time I hear about it, I thought it was just
>>closed source.
>
> The instance at gitlab.com is the non-free Enterprise Edition (EE). EE has
> features we proba
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I don't know about plugging in zuul and nodepool, but the CE does have CI
> integration, which we use in the GNU Mailman project, and seems to work
> great.
What CI tools are you using with GitLab CE?
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"A s
On Oct 06, 2015, at 07:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>Interesting. It's the first time I hear about it, I thought it was just
>closed source.
The instance at gitlab.com is the non-free Enterprise Edition (EE). EE has
features we probably don't care about ayway. The Community Edition (CE) is
MIT/
On 10/06/2015 05:42 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 06, 2015, at 08:39 AM, Brian May wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>>> This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review system (and not
>>> just Git) which could do tests on each change of a package even befor
On Oct 06, 2015, at 08:39 AM, Brian May wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review system (and not
>> just Git) which could do tests on each change of a package even before
>> having them committed to our git.
>>
>
>Sounds l
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 01:02 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:39:48AM +, Brian May wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>
> >>> This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review syst
On 10/06/2015 01:02 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:39:48AM +, Brian May wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>>> This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review system (and not
>>> just Git) which could do tests on each change of a package
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:39:48AM +, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review system (and not
> > just Git) which could do tests on each change of a package even before
> > having them committed to our git
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> This IMO is the same topic as having a Gerrit review system (and not
> just Git) which could do tests on each change of a package even before
> having them committed to our git.
>
Sounds like an interesting thing to discuss/test after we move t
On 10/05/2015 11:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 05, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> In other distributions (Red Hat and Ubuntu), everyone is aware of this
>> kind of issue before uploading, and this kinds of things don't happen.
>
> Ubuntu at least does have a technical solutio
11 matches
Mail list logo
