On 9/6/07, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > So I myself chose to be among Uploaders and set Maintainer to DPMT,
> > > > because this more enforces team work and I like team work.
> >
> > > I had a discussion on #debian-devel about this,
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > So I myself chose to be among Uploaders and set Maintainer to DPMT,
> > > because this more enforces team work and I like team work.
>
> > I had a discussion on #debian-devel about this, and "they" thought it
> > was pretty stupid to have DPMT as up
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one*
> > > person named as the responsible party for the packages.
> > > It's a fact of human psychology tha
On 9/6/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one*
> > person named as the responsible party for the packages.
> >
> > It's a fact of human psychology that if a collective group is named as
> > the responsible party, then nob
> This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one*
> person named as the responsible party for the packages.
>
> It's a fact of human psychology that if a collective group is named as
> the responsible party, then nobody in that group feels particularly
> responsible. This is on
"Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the moment, it's set to me, but it seems to me it's better for
> everybody, if it is rather set to DPMT, since that way everyone
> should feel encouraged to fix things in all DPMT packages.
The bug reports are available, for those looking for thing
6 matches
Mail list logo