Re: gphoto2 package name problem

2016-03-30 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Damon, On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 06:19:58PM +0500, Damon Lynch wrote: > I'd like the help of a Debian packager / developer to rename a Debian > package before Ubuntu 16.04 is released. Very likely also required is > changing the name of the package's python module. The Debian package > maintainer

Re: gphoto2 package name problem

2016-03-30 Thread Damon Lynch
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Damon, > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:55:28PM +0500, Damon Lynch wrote: > > Good news: the developer of gphoto2-cffi has just confirmed that he is > happy > > for both the package name of his project to be renamed into > > "python-gpho

Re: gphoto2 package name problem

2016-02-22 Thread Damon Lynch
On 02/22/2016 12:37 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: [...] I am assuming it will take a bit of time for for "python-gphoto2" (https://github.com/jim-easterbrook/python-gphoto2) to make it into Debian. Let me know if I can help, keeping in mind I'm very much a python application developer and not a pack

Re: gphoto2 package name problem

2016-02-21 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Damon, On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:55:28PM +0500, Damon Lynch wrote: > Good news: the developer of gphoto2-cffi has just confirmed that he is happy > for both the package name of his project to be renamed into > "python-gphoto2cffi" in Debian, and for the currently unpackaged project > "python-g

Re: gphoto2 package name problem

2016-02-21 Thread Damon Lynch
Hi Dimitry, On 02/20/2016 04:47 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:53:18AM +0500, Damon Lynch wrote: The problem was resolved when the developer of gphoto2-cffi agreed to rename the imported module as gphoto2cffi instead of gphoto2. [...] This leaves the problem of the conf

Re: gphoto2 package name problem

2016-02-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Damon, On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:53:18AM +0500, Damon Lynch wrote: > The problem was resolved when the developer of gphoto2-cffi agreed to rename > the imported module as gphoto2cffi instead of gphoto2. > > [...] > > This leaves the problem of the confusing Debian package name for the project