Re: XS-Python-Version: "current" fix

2010-06-23 Thread Éric Araujo
>> While "current" is frowned upon[0], this is not what caused your package >> breakage. The culprit it that scripts have #!/usr/bin/pythonX.Y shebangs - >> if they were unversioned, the package would continue to work with new >> Python. > > Those are changed by python distutils, that's why a rebu

Re: XS-Python-Version: "current" fix (was: Re: RFS: deejayd (updated package))

2010-06-23 Thread Alexandre Rossi
> While "current" is frowned upon[0], this is not what caused your package > breakage. The culprit it that scripts have #!/usr/bin/pythonX.Y shebangs - > if they were unversioned, the package would continue to work with new > Python. Those are changed by python distutils, that's why a rebuild fixe

Re: XS-Python-Version: "current" fix (was: Re: RFS: deejayd (updated package))

2010-06-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Alexandre Rossi" wrote: >Hi, > >The current version of my package does not launch in unstable >following the switch of the current python version. I think it is >because of the "current" keyword in the "XS-Python-Version" tag. A >rebuild fixes the problem. > >Is this appropriate fix? >-XS-Pyth

Re: XS-Python-Version: "current" fix (was: Re: RFS: deejayd (updated package))

2010-06-23 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Alexandre Rossi , 2010-06-23, 10:53: The current version of my package does not launch in unstable following the switch of the current python version. I think it is because of the "current" keyword in the "XS-Python-Version" tag. A rebuild fixes the problem. Is this appropriate fix? -XS-Python