Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 23.10.2010 13:26, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Fr, 2010-10-22 at 14:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Tell that the Arch people: http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/ Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fr, 2010-10-22 at 14:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > >Tell that the Arch people: > >http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/ > > > >Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X > > I heard that Gentoo has done i

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >Tell that the Arch people: >http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/ > >Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X I heard that Gentoo has done it too, but I have not verified that. -Barry signature.asc Descripti

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 18, 2010, at 05:33 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: >If you mean “port all the scripts and applications of the default >installation from python to python3”, then that’s a goal that could be >achieved for wheezy. Especially if we work with other Python porters: http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mo, 2010-10-18 at 17:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : > > That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN > > release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts > > going on, and

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : > That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN > release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts > going on, and Debian would be heroic to be one of the long term > releases (earl

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-18 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 21:19, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, >> but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] >> >> I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Py

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-16 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: I'm wondering if we really need a dh_pysupport wrapper or if we should just fix the packages instead. And easier transition would be to provide dh_pycentral and ph_pysupport wrappers which just do the right thing, together with a lintian error telling

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, > but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] > > I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy. > > Python 2.7 is the last version

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-16 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10/15/2010 11:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, > but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] > > I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy. Full ack. > [...] > I want the next transition t