On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 at 17:47:40 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> At the moment - since there were no objections yet - I have revised the
> wiki documentation (link already provided) to include DEP-14 and
> debian/master (as per DEP-14).
I think there's value in using debian/master for the focus of develo
Thomas Goirand writes:
>> Why debian/unstable, and not debian/sid?
>
> Because "unstable" is what we write in debian/changelog, so that's
> consistent, and also consistent if we upload to experimental. But I'm
> fine either ways anyway, if others would like to use debian/sid because
> it's faster
On 03/06/2017 11:18 PM, Brian May wrote:
> On 2017-03-07 08:43, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> I prefer if we use debian/unstable rather than debian/master though, so
>> it is more explicit where we upload that branch.
>
> My reading of DEP-14 is that is says we should use debian/master.
>
> Not t
On 2017-03-07 08:43, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I prefer if we use debian/unstable rather than debian/master though, so
> it is more explicit where we upload that branch.
My reading of DEP-14 is that is says we should use debian/master.
Not that I care much myself, either is fine with me.
Why de
On 03/06/2017 09:25 PM, Brian May wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes:
>
>> Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the
>> views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about
>> branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it was pretty hard wired)?
Scott Kitterman writes:
> Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the
> views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about
> branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it was pretty hard wired)?
I tend to think that branching will easier wit
6 matches
Mail list logo
