David Coe wrote:
> There are/were a minor bugs against the task-python-* packages in
> unstable, all due to broken dependencies; those are easy to fix, but
> are one of the things that drove us away from the old task-* packages,
> as I understand it.
Yep. It's not the end of the world in the new s
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> According to Joey Hess, it seems that the python-dev needs
> someone to maintain it.
Well, the best maintainer would probably (presumably) be the
maintainer[1] of task-pthon-dev. I'm going to go through and contact the
maintainers of the task packages indiviually and wor
2 matches
Mail list logo
