Florent Rougon wrote:
> Yes, I know the technical conditions that justify Conflicts and
> Replaces, I only proposed them as a means to get users' package managers
> to automatically propose the upgrade from python-dialog to
> python3-dialog...
Hmm... I believe I spoke a bit quickly and that this
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Replaces: would not be appropriate or necessary since none of the
> files are overlapping; this is only necessary when two packages
> install files to the same location, and the one package must be
> installed over the other.
>
> Conflicts: would not be appropriate eith
On 22 October 2014 09:47, Florent Rougon wrote:
> It is in unstable, thank you! I wonder if the new package
> (python3-dialog) should not have Conflicts and Replaces with
> python-dialog. Although I suppose both packages can be installed at the
> same time, the current situation may leave the old,
Hi,
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>> The package is already uploaded, right?
>
> It is, and processed through NEW. I uploaded -2 earlier today to fix
> #766041 and I believe it is now in unstable; it looks like the PTS
> isn't updated yet, though, possibly related to some problems with
> Debian infra
On 19 October 2014 23:21, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Thank you very much, that was quick! I have subscribed using:
>
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/pts.cgi?what=advanced&package=source_package_name&email=y...@email.com
>
> The package is already uploaded, right?
It is, and processed th
'evening!
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Looks like your Debian account is marked emeritus; if you wish to
> re-activate it you could follow the process described here:
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developer-duties.html#returning
Thanks for the info, maybe later...
>
On 19 October 2014 14:40, Florent Rougon wrote:
> would be glad to be co-maintainer of the package. (I am a former DD, so
> maybe there is some account (frn) to reuse instead of creating a new
> one...)
Looks like your Debian account is marked emeritus; if you wish to
re-activate it you could fol
Hi,
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Thus I intend to take over the existing ITA and inject Florent's
> source package into DPMT now, under the old source package name
> (pythondialog), and review it for upload. Florent, would you like to
> be listed as one of the package co-maintainers? If you don't
On 17 October 2014 17:59, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> Please note that this is not a team-maintained package. We could do a
>> non-maintainer upload of it, but I'd rather see either 1) Adam, the current
>> maintainer CC'd here, update the package, or 2) have Adam move the pa
Hi,
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Please note that this is not a team-maintained package. We could do a
> non-maintainer upload of it, but I'd rather see either 1) Adam, the current
> maintainer CC'd here, update the package, or 2) have Adam move the package to
> the Debian Python team, where we could
Am 17.10.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Barry Warsaw:
> Hi Florent,
>
> On Oct 17, 2014, at 04:17 PM, Florent Rougon wrote:
>
>> As the upstream maintainer of pythondialog, I feel a bit concerned about
>> its status in Debian, in particular about what is going to go into
>> jessie. In short, I'd rather se
Hi Florent,
On Oct 17, 2014, at 04:17 PM, Florent Rougon wrote:
>As the upstream maintainer of pythondialog, I feel a bit concerned about
>its status in Debian, in particular about what is going to go into
>jessie. In short, I'd rather see the package removed from Debian than
>stay in the current
12 matches
Mail list logo
