On Sep 11, 2011, at 12:22 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> >yep, NEWS.txt.gz is now a symlink to changelog.gz
>> >thanks to dh_installchangelogs' "-k flufl/lock/NEWS.txt" option in your
>> >debian/rules
>>
>> I'm still not getting this one, so I don't know what to do about it.
>
>"-k flufl/lock/NEWS
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2011-09-11]
> > >* flufl.lock-2.1.1-nspkg.pth is not really needed (I think I will add an
> > > option to dh_python2 to remove .pth files, I cannot do that by
> > > default, though)
> >
> > This is an artifact of `python setup.py install-egg-info`. Is it harmful to
> > leave i
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-09-09]
> On Sep 08, 2011, at 11:37 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> >[Barry Warsaw, 2011-09-08]
> >> >W: python-flufl.lock: duplicate-changelog-files
> >> >usr/share/doc/python-flufl.lock/changelog.gz
> >> >usr/share/doc/python-flufl.lock/html/_sources/NEWS.txt.gz
> >>
> >> I'm not
On Sep 08, 2011, at 11:37 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Barry Warsaw, 2011-09-08]
>> >* build directory is not removed in clean target (and thus package
>> > cannot be build twice in a row)
>
>this one is fixed, but now I get changes in SOURCES.txt which
>includes... .txt files in debian/python-fl
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-09-08]
> >* build directory is not removed in clean target (and thus package
> > cannot be build twice in a row)
this one is fixed, but now I get changes in SOURCES.txt which
includes... .txt files in debian/python-flufl.lock/usr/lib/python2.7
(due to "global-include *.txt" in
On Sep 08, 2011, at 08:19 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 00:07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>>W: flufl.lock source: build-depends-on-1-revision build-depends:
>>>python-sphinx (>= 1.0.7+dfsg-1)
>>
>> Bumped this down to 1.0.7.
>
>No, you need at least 1.0.7+dfsg
On IRC, Jakub suggested
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 14:39, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 08:19 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 00:07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
W: flufl.lock source: build-depends-on-1-revision build-depends:
python-sphinx (>= 1.0.7+dfsg-1)
>>>
>>> Bumped this down to 1.0.7.
>>
>>
On 09/08/2011 08:19 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 00:07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> W: flufl.lock source: build-depends-on-1-revision build-depends:
>>> python-sphinx (>= 1.0.7+dfsg-1)
>>
>> Bumped this down to 1.0.7.
>
> No, you need at least 1.0.7+dfsg
Would it fail to build wit
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 00:07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>W: flufl.lock source: build-depends-on-1-revision build-depends:
>>python-sphinx (>= 1.0.7+dfsg-1)
>
> Bumped this down to 1.0.7.
No, you need at least 1.0.7+dfsg
> This one also feels a bit bogus to me. Do I really *have* to have an extended
I've finally managed to look into these problems. I believe I've solved them
all and will commit the updates, along with cargo-culting the same changes
into the other three flufl.* packages, asap.
On Aug 23, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Barry Warsaw, 2011-08-22]
>> I've managed to
On Aug 23, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>for this I think you need /dev/shm bind-mounted in the pbuilder chroot.
Correct. I have this set (now ;) in my own build config files.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 23:06, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> * it FTBFS in my pbuilder (works fine on my desktop):
>
> ==
> FAIL: /tmp/buildd/flufl.lock-2.1.1/flufl/lock/docs/using.txt
> Doctest: using.txt
> ---
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-08-22]
> I've managed to file ITPs and package up two more flufl packages, flufl.lock
* build directory is not removed in clean target (and thus package
cannot be build twice in a row)
* lintian complains with:
W: flufl.lock source: build-depends-on-1-revision build-depends:
13 matches
Mail list logo
