On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> pyliblo 0.8.1-2
>
> Agreed, looks broken.
Fixed in 0.8.1-3.
Please unblock.
Regards.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
--
To UNSUBSC
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:08:04 +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> pyliblo 0.8.1-2
> >
> > Agreed, looks broken.
>
> Fixed in 0.8.1-3.
> Please unblock.
>
Done.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 09/27/2010 09:14 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27.09.2010 at 00:10:35 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> Yes, and? We will have Python2.5 in Lenny thanks to your own fault of
>> starting
>> the transition more than half a year too late. Please don't start to create a
>> mess now.
>
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 à 23:53 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> > > > >gnome-python-extras 2.25.
Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 à 23:53 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> > > >gnome-python-extras 2.25.3-5
> > > python-gda depends on both python2.5 and libpython2.6.
>
Hi,
On Mon, 27.09.2010 at 00:10:35 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Yes, and? We will have Python2.5 in Lenny thanks to your own fault of starting
> the transition more than half a year too late. Please don't start to create a
> mess now.
I'm not sure I understand. Maybe s/Lenny/Squeeze/?
Kind r
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 à 23:53 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> > >gnome-python-extras 2.25.3-5
> > python-gda depends on both python2.5 and libpython2.6.
>
> Fixed in 2.25.3-6. Please unblock.
I thought such cases were, according
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 à 23:53 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> >gnome-python-extras 2.25.3-5
> python-gda depends on both python2.5 and libpython2.6.
Fixed in 2.25.3-6. Please unblock.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed
On 09/26/2010 09:49 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> There still around 50 packages depending, recommending or suggesting
> python2.5, without explicitly build-depending on python2.5 or
> python2.5-dev.
Yes, and? We will have Python2.5 in Lenny thanks to your own fault of starting
the transition more t
* Matthias Klose , 2010-09-26, 21:49:
A large chunk of these seem to be release critical, especially those
which depend on python python2.6 (libpython2.6) and python2.5.
On the contrary, these are safe to ignore in most cases. Such
dependencies are typically autogenerated because Python module
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 21:49:28 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The easier solution would be to remove python2.5 from the list of
> supported python versions and rebuild.
>
NAK. The solution to an incomplete python transition is not to
introduce yet another one.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
D
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> that could have been more clear, but I do have such tools to follow the
> transition, I use[1]. The two rounds of mass bug have been package that
> build public modules and extensions, and then all the other ones (+
> some missed one at the first st
Le mer 2 août 2006 11:23, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> - status of the transition Wiki page: a summary of steps which are
>in progress (pointer to python transition pseudo-bug, pointers to
>the list of bugs to be fixed in the mass bug filing, description of
>the step)
that could have been
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Yesterday, a last round of bugs has been filled against packages that
> may need an upgrade to comply with the recent python policy[1].
That's great! We all want python to be python2.4 in etch, thanks for
your work.
We already discussed together
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 10:21 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> Yesterday, a last round of bugs has been filled against packages that
> may need an upgrade to comply with the recent python policy[1].
Please also note that some of these bugs are invalid. For example, if
the package ships some
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> From gst0.10-python's configure.ac:
[...]
> PYGTK_DEFSDIR=`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=defsdir pygtk-2.0`
> => (/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs: I can only ship that one time)
> PYGTK_H2DEF=`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=codegendir pygtk-2.0`/h2def.py
> PYG
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> It's also possible to influence the PKG_CONFIG_PATH, eg.
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkg-config/python2.3:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH in
> debian/rules.
I tried this, and it wasn't too hard except it needed a "rtupdate"
script to update the symlinks after a defa
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Or should pyexecdir be dropped from .pc files?
After some IRC discussion, this is not an option, and would violate the
contract between the upstream .pc file authors and the upstream
application developers trying to use these .pc files.
Some other i
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 03:37:24PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Based on the lists I posted earlier during the transition and on doko's
> lists of packages holding the move to testing, here is a summary of
> python-related packages which still have issues regarding the python
> policy. I have d
Kenneth Pronovici writes:
> > Still need to be updated:
> [...]
> > * python-epydoc: the default package doesn't depend on python
>
> I did the last NMU for python-epydoc because Moshe seems to be missing
> in action (?); I can probably fix this problem as well.
>
> Just to make sure I understand
Le ven 17/10/2003 à 16:34, Kenneth Pronovici a écrit :
> Just to make sure I understand, I should be changing the python-epydoc
> dependencies from this:
>
>Depends: python2.3-epydoc
>
> to this:
>
>Depends: python (>= 2.3), python (<< 2.4), python2.3-epydoc
>
> Correct?
This is correc
> Still need to be updated:
[...]
> * python-epydoc: the default package doesn't depend on python
I did the last NMU for python-epydoc because Moshe seems to be missing
in action (?); I can probably fix this problem as well.
Just to make sure I understand, I should be changing the python-epydoc
d
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 01:49:46PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Packages, that are too young are not considered for migration to
> > testing. As these packages have a dependency on "python (>=2.3)", they
>
> Few, if any, of my pac
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Packages, that are too young are not considered for migration to
> testing. As these packages have a dependency on "python (>=2.3)", they
Few, if any, of my packages have such a dependency. In most packages, I
depend on the specifi
John Goerzen writes:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:18:41PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The e-mail I sent made several exceptions from the freeze, one of them
> > fixing RC reports. So yes, you are supposed to fix these problems
> > yourself. As I introduced this RC in 0.5.1-5.1, I fixed it in
>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:18:41PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The e-mail I sent made several exceptions from the freeze, one of them
> fixing RC reports. So yes, you are supposed to fix these problems
> yourself. As I introduced this RC in 0.5.1-5.1, I fixed it in
> 0.5.1-5.2.
Which is nice, b
John Goerzen writes:
> Hello,
>
> I hope I am not alone in this.
>
> I find the whole Python transition process to be rather confusing. For
> instance, I recently received an e-mail asking me not to upload various
> Python packages. A day later, one of them got NMU'd. I am confused; what
> exa
Le lun 25/08/2003 à 22:44, John Belmonte a écrit :
> There seems to be a package I'm interested in that is missing from the
> TODO list: quixote.
>
> Actually, many packages seem to be missing. I use this command to get a
> list:
>
> grep-available -F Depends "python2.2" -s Package | \
>
There seems to be a package I'm interested in that is missing from the
TODO list: quixote.
Actually, many packages seem to be missing. I use this command to get a
list:
grep-available -F Depends "python2.2" -s Package | \
cut -d " " -f 2 | grep -v "2.2" | sort
Also, I think every
Le mar 12/08/2003 à 18:52, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote :
>
> > What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
> > fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
> > expected.
>
> Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as d
Josselin Mouette writes:
> I've put a summary of packages needing a rebuild in a world-writable
> file at http://people.debian.org/~joss/python-list.txt
> python-numarray-ext => updated but the new package misses python (>= 2.3),
> python (<< 2.4)
unneeded, as it depends on python-numarray.
any
Josselin Mouette wrote :
> What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
> fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
> expected.
Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as default python
version (waiting for python-bsddb3). I don't have ac
Le mar 12/08/2003 à 16:45, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> python-tal is maintained by the QA team so I thought I'd help and NMU
> it.
>
> I added a python2.3-tal package and it built correctly but the
> no-version package (python-tal) still depends upon python2.2-tal (I
> changed Build-depen
Quoting Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Yesterday was saturday, and I don't read my mail on week ends. The
> > updated package is in progress (i.e. pbuilder is running right now),
> > and I have contacted Jerome Marant who's my usual sponstor (I'm not a
> > DD). I was planning to
> Yesterday was saturday, and I don't read my mail on week ends. The
> updated package is in progress (i.e. pbuilder is running right now),
> and I have contacted Jerome Marant who's my usual sponstor (I'm not a
> DD). I was planning to ask someone on the list to sponsor the upload if
> I don't
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I need the python-xml package to rebuild some of my packages
> (python-gtk, python-gtk2, python-gnome2, python-pyorbit, rubrica), but
> python-xml is away from unstable because of transition.
>
> Several packages us
36 matches
Mail list logo
