Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-17 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Anthony Towns writes: > > ] python-2.1_2.1.1 > > ] python_2.1.1 (depends on python-2.1) (does "ln /usr/bin/python{2.1,}") > > ] python-2.1-_ (depends on python-2.1) > > ] python-_ (depends on python and python-2.1-) > > Hrm. That

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-16 Thread Donovan Baarda
Quoting Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Anthony Towns writes: > > ] python-2.1_2.1.1 > > ] python_2.1.1 (depends on python-2.1) (does "ln > /usr/bin/python{2.1,}") > > ] python-2.1-_ (depends on python-2.1) > > ] python-_ (depends on python and > python-2.1-) > > > > Hrm. That should be

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Anthony Towns writes: > ] python-2.1_2.1.1 > ] python_2.1.1 (depends on python-2.1) (does "ln /usr/bin/python{2.1,}") > ] python-2.1-_ (depends on python-2.1) > ] python-_ (depends on python and python-2.1-) > > Hrm. That should be: > > Package: python- > Version: > Depends

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-16 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Jérôme Marant writes: > > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? > - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between > one python version and a next version. compare python-1.5 to libc5 >

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-15 Thread Donovan Baarda
Quoting Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Donovan Baarda writes: > > Quoting Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > > I don't see how this was such a showstopper. Getting the > > dependancies right to ensure a clean transition would have been > > fairly easy. > > Then again, why do we us

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Donovan Baarda writes: > Quoting Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Jérôme Marant writes: > > > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? > > > > - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between > > one python version and a next version. compare pyt

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-15 Thread Donovan Baarda
Quoting Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jérôme Marant writes: > > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? > > - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between > one python version and a next version. compare python-1.5 to libc5 > and python-2.1 t

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-14 Thread Bruce Sass
On 14 Oct 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jérôme Marant writes: > > > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? > > > > - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between > > one python version and a next version. co

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-14 Thread Jérôme Marant
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Reading > http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2001/debian-python-200109/msg3.html > I don't see any response/reaction from Neil on Gregor's last > proposal. So did he "silently ignore" Gregor's packages? I didn't > "silently prepared the pack

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Jérôme Marant writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Jérôme Marant writes: > > > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? > > > > - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between > > one python version and a next version. compare pytho

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-14 Thread Jérôme Marant
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant writes: > > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? > > - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between > one python version and a next version. compare python-1.5 to libc5 > and python-2.1 to

Re: Python packages in incoming

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Jérôme Marant writes: > What about proposal and policy from Neil and his efforts? - the proposed packaging scheme doesn't allow smooth upgrades between one python version and a next version. compare python-1.5 to libc5 and python-2.1 to libc6. there was a clear upgrade procedure to do the