Barry Warsaw writes:
> AFAIK, there is *no* official declaration (e.g. from Guido or the
> mythical Python 4 release manager) about this either way.
In support of your position, Guido van Rossum has informally implied
version “3.10” is feasible for a future Python 3
https://twitter.com/gvanrossu
Don't panic. :)
On Nov 03, 2016, at 09:28 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>But the above post implies that pointless confusion will be directly
>courted, merely because of some aesthetic objection to a two-digit
>component in the version string.
Those are Nick's opinions. Everyone's got one!
AFAIK, ther
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Nov 02, 2016, at 01:57 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> >Certainly the command ‘python3’ should only ever point to the Python
> >3 interpreter.
> >
> >If upstream ever releases a “Python 4” but expects the interpreter
> >for that to also be named ‘python3’, I think we can decla
On Nov 02, 2016, at 01:57 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>Donald Stufft writes:
>
>> /usr/bin/python3 being Python 4.x is a bit weird though
>
>Seriously? Who is proposing that?
>
>> and it’s likely that Python 4.x is not going to be another break the
>> world release.
>
>Certainly the command ‘python
4 matches
Mail list logo
